Turkey, Armenia, the US and Parochial Politics vs. Strategic Thinking

The recent U.S. House passed resolution condeming the Armenian Genocide from the early 1900s is an act of moral sermonizing that also complicates contemporary geopolitics.
 
This is a good story from the Atlantic Council blog with my comments below,
 
"Parochialism and interest group politics reign in the U.S. Congress.

 It certainly should be hoped that no serious damage is done to US-Turkish relations. Fortunately, despite the histrionics, I doubt this resolution will cause any long-term damage. Any long-term damage will be the result of other, larger, more systemic issues that are much more substantive in contemporary terms such as natural gas politics, Turkish geopolitical ambitions in the Middle East and the seeming conflict between Islamism and secular ideology within Turkey as seen through the Ergenekon prism.

 That said, this resolution is a classic case of Congressional meddling in foreign policy in ways it should not.

I think most people find the Armenian Genocide to be a terribly obvious crime. However, nothing good can come from a Congressional resolution picking at these scabs. Statemanship requires the ability to think strategically. Clearly, that is not something Congress is all that capable of doing in this instance."

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.